Art vs Advertising
I got into a heated debate the other day with a friend who is a graphic designer over whether or not advertising was art. I guess you can figure out who picked which side. I’m firmly on the no side of this argument.
It started when I mention my cash flow problems from the last couple of months and he suggested that I should change careers’ and become a graphic designer, “So your artistic skills aren’t going to waste” he says. That statement really pissed me off and I made some reply to the effect that graphic design wasn’t really art. I obliviously hit a nerve with him and the argument was on.
I know this debate has been around for a very long time and I doubt I can add much to it that hasn’t already been said a million times. I just get very tired living in a world where the only “artistic “ outlet is graphic design, especially when I don’t really believe graphic design is truly art. I get tired of well-meaning friends trying to “help” with well-intentioned suggestions. Don’t get me wrong I have a lot of friends who really like my work and want to see me continue with what I’m doing, it’s just that there always seems to be somebody around ready to seed doubts and I’m always ready to fall for it.
The old argument that Pop Art levelled the playing field between art and advertising never really held any water for me. Pop Art showed that advertising can be raised to the level of art but failed to prove in my eyes that it should apply to all advertising.
Advertising is subversive and manipulative. Its sole purpose to exist is to sell some product, if it can sell you something without you being aware, even better. To me it’s visual noise, something to try to mentally avoid even though it may be working on me even though I’m not aware of it.
The fact that so much of our society is willing to accept advertising as art says a lot about our consumer culture. To confuse the two shows how visually illiterate or world has become or maybe our everyday lives are so devoid of art that we are willing to grab hold of any image we can to fill the gap.
Contemporary Art requires the viewer to be visually engaged in a way that a lot of modern viewers simply don’t want to be. There are so many easier forms of entertainment available today. Why go through the mental aerobics of trying to understand art when TV is so much easier to grasp? For the most part people are visually lazy and advertising feeds off that laziness.
Art and advertising share a lot of similar traits. Advertising borrows extensively from art, and since the era of Pop Art, art has borrowed from Advertising. Art requires a level of visual engagement that advertising could never stand up too. Advertising doesn’t want you to think beyond your immediate wants. To really see advertising is to look beyond its cheap façade, to see its inner workings, to understand how it manipulates and not be fooled by its cheap glamour.


Reader Comments (16)
Would you Please accept my best wishes of success for this new year. I visit your site often, I'm deeply touched by yourself and your world.There are a lot of good painters around the world but not many artist ,I believe you're one.
Elaine from France.
Some people think it’s a good idea to use our art to make money in other careers, but if you aren’t passionate about graphic design than better to wash dishes and create what you really want to; same with teaching art. So many artists get MFAs so they can teach art at Universities and then stop making their own work because teaching it takes all of their energy.
Agreed! And well-said.
Good blog--I will come back and view your work when time permits.
Warm Regards,
Jude C. in GA (USA, that is)
I can see why people might suggest illustration, more than graphic design, to you as your work has a very strong story telling quality to it and three dimensional work often adds an interesting twist when featured in print or web media.
I agree that design is not art - having worked as graphic designer and now struggling to make my own art - because the job of a designer is fundamentally to bring to life someone else's ideas and not their own. However, that's not to say that graphic design is never 'artistic' nor is it always used for unethical purposes as many a charity has had its donations increased because of a well thought out advertising campaign. Might you consider submitting work you have already completed for use in an campaign by an ethical/educational organisation? I could see your pieces working very well in that context - it might help you with your cash flow but at the same time you would still be free to exhibit and sell the original piece. Just a thought!
Your other question is interesting and probalby deserves an entry all of it's own. It's rather a slippery slope I think.
Well, since then I've quit the graphic design biz and have been painting as much as possible for the past two years. Like many artists, I can't live on painting alone and have had to fall back on a mindless part time telemarketing job which sucks more than doing graphic design. I don't know what the answer is.
I was heartened to learn of Joan Miro's plight as a bookeeper who was fired for drawing pictures on the books. Ha. This is an age old artist's dilemma. At least now I know I'm being true to my calling and getting my hands dirty with paint as often as I can.
Thanks