« Hmmmm, I Wonder What Would Happen If I Did This..... | Main | August Mini Project Completed »

No Such Thing As A "Non Artist"

   Edward Winkleman has an interesting post on his blog  "What Makes Someone "Not an Artist?”. For myself the answer is very simple. There is no such thing as a "non artist".  Here's a quote from his site.

                       "We have degrees and exams to define doctors or lawyers or scientists and such, but even armed with an MFA, a graduate seemingly still needs to pass some unspoken test to earn the title "artist" for most people. And of course, there's no requirement that one has an art degree to earn the title if the evidence (their art) is convincing enough. We would never  let a self‑taught "surgeon" demonstrate their right to that title (at least, not on us) or a self‑declared "lawyer" try an important case for us, no matter how many episodes of "Law & Order" they convinced us were decided incorrectly. As a society, we have measures of competence for such professions we expect to be met.

    This seems to be such a hard question to get a straight answer to.  Occupations such as lawyers and doctors are highly specialized niches where as art  is a universal human experience.  Long before there were lawyers and doctors there were cave paintings in France and although the concept of "Art" may not have existed for the people who drew the pictures of animals and hunters on the cave walls who in our modern world would argue that it's not art.

    One definition often used to define an Artist is the creation of some object or idea from scratch.  What's often over looked here is that this creation is going on all the time all around us.  All of human existence is an act of creation.  We are born, experiences happen to use and over time we weave those experiences into a narrative that tells the stories which are our lives.  These individual stories entwine to form communities and these communal stories entwine to form our collective history.  All of human civilization is one big art project.  It is such a universal experience that almost everyone thinks nothing of it.  Even people who title themselves Artist may be blind to the fact that their  everyday experiences are  acts of artistic creation.  The reason why it's so hard to define an Artist is because every human has a right to claim that title for themselves if they want it.

    In today's culture a capital A "Artist" would usually be  regarded as a specialist.  They choose their materials, their mediums and their subjects.  They develop their specialized symbolic vocabulary and hopefully their fellow human beings will place some value on their creations.  With some luck these individual acts of creation will get added to the larger human art project of civilization.

Posted on Sunday, September 10, 2006 at 08:59AM by Registered CommenterHoward | Comments9 Comments

Reader Comments (9)

That's an interesting post and not a point of view most Artists (notice the capital) are willing to take. I am somewhat of a self-taught artist (notice the small letter) and have always been self-conscious of the fact I didn't have a degree to make me "official." I just do it because I need to and it makes me happy. If other people like it, all the better. Anyway, I just wanted to say I appreciated the post...and I, too, believe we are all creative artists in our own individual ways.
September 12, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterteresa
I think Artist who go through the educational system are rather protective of their degrees, but any art instructor will tell you that 90% of the people who go through the Art Instutional experinece will not continue in the field of art. I think that says a lot. There's more to art than just the a nice degree.
September 12, 2006 | Registered CommenterHoward
I agree with you. Art is a universal experience and also, a universal impulse from early childhood onward. Some of us stay artists and many do not, but the degree part only seems to really help in the 20s and 30s. By 50, alot of people have stopped asking me: where did you go to school? It matters less and less, the more of a body of work you create.

The art world is indeed very protective of their system of degrees because everyone who went through that system paid some kind of price, even if we are just talking money. Yet we are rarely just talking money. That's why 'defense' of a thesis becomes so important in that system, because you'll be defending it all till the day you die.
September 16, 2006 | Unregistered Commentereva lake
This is such an interesting theme, and something that most artists (capital and lower-case) grapple with...can I call myself an Aritist if I don't have a degree in art, or an MFA, or when I do have the degree but I've been on a 5 year dry streak, or just because I *feel* like one in my heart. I agree with you Howard that we all have that creative potential that some choose to explore to a greater extent than others but how we choose to refer to ourselves is up to us. If you feel like an artist than you are one. End of story.

September 17, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterElise
I agree with you Elise.

and Eva you're right about the degree not meaning as much later on.

September 17, 2006 | Registered CommenterHoward
Hey Howard, looks like I won't be moving down south after all (I bet you don't get referred to as "Down South" that often eh?)...

I turned that job down, just can't seem to tear myself away from Alaska...it's gotten into me bones.
:)
Hopefully I will make it down to Vancouver at some point in the future though.
September 21, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterElise
Yeah I've read your blog and it's sounds like you've made the right choice for yourself. I'd be hard press to find a reason why I'd want to move away form Vancouver. I love to the coast too much. Although I could imagine living on Vancouver Island, the Gulf Islands, or the Sunshine Coast without too much difficulty.
September 21, 2006 | Registered CommenterHoward
A better and more difficult question to ask is what is art?

What makes something a piece of art? I've tried for a definition and it can't be done because the thing that makes something art is an indefineable tiny something extra that we all recognise but can't put our finger on or quite describe. The difference between a nice looking image that's worth a glance and an image that continues to reward you, every time you look at it over the years, for its place on the wall.

But my prejudice of what's NOT art is that it's something lacking in craft, with little thought, is put together lazily, and is justified by a long winded highbrow explanation using as many big arty words as can be fitted in. A UK publication called Private Eye contains a regular piece called pseuds corner where they collect the worst of that sort of drivel.

And why is an art degree just a bit of paper not worth one breath defending? Because what you do is visible and should do all the talking for you. Getting the degree should have been the journey of gaining the skills and experience from those already travelled, and then you launch out on your own with that jump start. Your work speaks for you.

The downside is that the money making art establishment (and the education establishment protecting itself) won't bet on talent without a paper trail that re assures them that your art is indeed art - no matter how good it might be.

So I say; rock on 'amateur artists' - your work, when it's good, should be as worthy as the 'names' in the art world. And the sooner the art buying public wise up - and realise they can get great art from local artists without a stupid markup more than any professional should need to make a comfortable living.

Yes artists should be tradesman. Paid for the hours and materials they put in. That's how art should be paid for. And like any profession, the better you are the more your time is worth.

Alan
November 12, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterA Scott
The whole question about "What is art?" is too subjective to really have an answer. Every person you ask will have a different answer. The only answer I can come up with is if someone values something as art, then it's art. It really doesn't matter what I think.
What happens a lot is people will defer judgement to an "Expert" and let them decide what art is for them. People have always let others decide what's important in their lives. Art is really no different.
November 13, 2006 | Registered CommenterHoward

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.